Political Turmoil Unleashed: MP Draws Parallel Between Suella Braverman's Rwanda Plan and Tactics Employed by Putin and Xi, Igniting Tory Civil War
"Tory Infighting Erupts Over Suella Braverman's Controversial Rwanda Proposal, Drawing Comparisons to Putin and Xi"
In a dramatic turn of events, a senior Tory MP, Damian Green, has sparked a heated internal debate by equating Suella Braverman's recent Rwanda proposal to the authoritarian tactics of Russia's Vladimir Putin and China's Xi Jinping. Braverman, the former Home Secretary, advocated for emergency powers to eliminate "all avenues of legal challenge" in order to expedite the resumption of flights. Green criticized her stance, deeming it the "most unconservative statement" ever made by a Conservative politician, cautioning against empowering the state to override legal constraints.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today program, Green emphasized the fundamental conservative principles of a democratic country governed by the rule of law, contrasting them with the autocratic tendencies of Putin and Xi. This controversy unfolded in the wake of the Supreme Court unanimously rejecting Rishi Sunak's plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda, citing its unlawfulness and the exorbitant cost of £140 million.
Undeterred by the setback, Braverman, who was recently dismissed from the Cabinet, outlined her plan in a Telegraph article, asserting that Parliament should pass "emergency legislation" designating Rwanda as a "safe country." She argued that the proposed plan, despite potential legal challenges, remains the most viable option to achieve the desired outcome before the next general election.
Braverman proposed "five tests," including the contentious exclusion of legal challenges to the government's plan. She asserted that the bill must facilitate flights before the upcoming election, bypassing prolonged domestic litigation. Expressing concern over potential delays, she warned that even with a favorable domestic court ruling, the process might shift to Strasbourg, where the European court could further scrutinize the legislation.
In a bid to expedite the emergency law, Braverman suggested that Parliament convene over Christmas. As the Tory party grapples with internal divisions over the controversial proposal, the clash between traditional conservative values and the urgency of Braverman's plan adds a new layer of complexity to an already tumultuous political landscape.
"Political Rift Deepens as Chancellor Jeremy Hunt Hesitates on Asylum Seeker Plans for Rwanda, Drawing Criticism and Opposition"
Tensions within the Tory party escalated on Thursday as Chancellor Jeremy Hunt declined to commit to sending asylum seekers to Rwanda in 2024 or before the next election. Hunt expressed optimism about the Prime Minister's recent proposals but stopped short of providing a guarantee, stating, "We are hopeful that because of the solutions that the Prime Minister announced yesterday we will be able to get flights off to Rwanda next year. We can't guarantee that."
The uncertainty surrounding the asylum seeker plan became a focal point on BBC Question Time, where Shadow Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson criticized the proposal, expressing hope that Tory ministers would abandon the "unworkable" Rwanda plan. Phillipson echoed the sentiments of the new Home Secretary, describing the policy as "batshit" and asserting that it's destined to fail, emphasizing its substantial cost of £140 million.
As the rift widens within the Conservative party, the lack of a firm commitment from Chancellor Hunt adds to the mounting skepticism surrounding the viability of the Rwanda proposal. The dissenting voices within and outside the party underscore the challenges faced by the government in garnering support for a plan that is increasingly being deemed impractical and costly.
In conclusion, the internal divisions within the Tory party over the controversial Rwanda asylum seeker plan have reached a critical juncture. Chancellor Jeremy Hunt's hesitancy to commit to the proposal's timeline has added a layer of uncertainty to the already contentious issue. As political tensions rise, the criticism voiced by Shadow Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, who labeled the plan as "unworkable" and echoed the sentiments of the new Home Secretary, underscores the uphill battle faced by proponents of the policy.
The lack of a guarantee from Hunt and the growing chorus of dissenting voices both within and outside the Conservative party cast doubt on the feasibility and efficacy of the Rwanda plan. The significant financial cost, amounting to £140 million, further intensifies the scrutiny and skepticism surrounding the proposed solution.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, the fate of the Rwanda asylum seeker plan remains uncertain. The party's internal struggle reflects the broader challenges of navigating a complex policy issue, highlighting the delicate balance between addressing immigration concerns and upholding principles that resonate with both party members and the public. The coming weeks and months will likely determine whether the Tory party can find common ground or if the internal divisions will deepen, potentially shaping the trajectory of the party's stance on immigration policy.